CPA Comms Officer on 27 February, 2023

Centre for Policy Alternatives (Guarantee) Ltd., and Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu vs. Nimal G. Punchihewa, Chairman – Election Commission and others [SC FR 79/2023]

Categories: Public Interest Litigation submissions
 

7th February 2023. The Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) and its Executive Director filed a Fundamental Rights application challenging the failure and/or refusal of several government departments to take the necessary steps to hold the Local Government Elections.

Elections to elect persons as members of Local Authorities in Sri Lanka are required to be held every 04 years (48 months) in terms of the relevant statutes. Elections were previously held in 2018, and the term of the Local Authorities that were due to expire in 2022 were extended for a year thereafter, and their term will expire shortly, with no further option available in law for extension.

On 30th January 2023, it was announced that the poll for Local Authorities Elections would be held on 09th March 2023. However, on 13th February 2023, the Elections Commission announced that it had been informed by the Government Printer that it would not be able to print the ballots necessary for the postal voting, if funds were not provided. It has also been reported that the Government Printer had stated that they cannot print the required ballot papers due to lack of Police security.

The Petitioners stated that the conduct of the Government Printer and the Inspector General of Police are indicative of a coordinated campaign to procrastinate the holding of Local Authority elections. The Petitioner also stated that the President, in his capacity as the Minister of Finance, and the secretary to the treasury have not, until the very last minute on the 23rd February 2023 indicated that there is a challenge in the allocation of funds to conduct the elections. These actions are prejudicial to the fundamental rights of the Petitioners and citizens of Sri Lanka.

The Petitioners have emphasized that the exercise of franchise as required in terms of the law is essential for a country to be a democracy, and the conduct of elections must be treated as an essential, for Sri Lanka to be and remain a democratic republic.

The Petitioners state that their rights under Articles 10, 12(1) and 14(1)(a) of the Constitution have been violated and/or continue to be violated by such attempts to sabotage and stall the holding of the Local Authority elections.

 


 

The Supreme Court on 22nd August 2024, delivered its judgement in this case. The Court concluded that the failure to hold the Local Government Elections as required by law is a violation of Article 12(1) and 14(1)(a) of the Constitution. The Supreme Court specifically held the Elections Commission liable for its “lack of proper planning and managing the process and for not using its powers to issue appropriate directions.” The Court further held that Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe’s “arbitrary and unlawful conduct” in his capacity as Minister of Finance and as President resulted in “the non-holding of the Local Government Elections 2023” and that he had thus violated the rights of citizens according to Article 12(1) and 14(1)(a) of the Constitution.

Click Here to Download the Judgement